Name change - VoIP General, VoIP News, VoIP Providers, VoIP hardware, VoIP software, VoIP Technology

After already the discussion over one “certified user“was led, I decided to consider to the goals behind it otherwise.

Like already with ebay, in social networks (XING, wkw, study….) I arise in the future in the IP-Phone-forum under my material name “Daniel Lcking”, instead of under an alias.

Behind it the attitude that Netz-und in particular the IP-Phone-forum - not to it is there, is simply times steam to discharge and against others too stnkern.

Beyond that I think that an expression of opinion has value even if the person stands behind it.

This idea is not again and also from some few different in the forum is practiced - I follow and take the imminent 2.000sten post office to the cause “DanMac”

to bury.

Here already the first Posting with the new account - signature still is in the production.

Well then… welcomely in the forum

Also of me welcomes in the forum

Perhaps you can get over a Admin of the 2K-VIP overwritten. Congratulations by the way on it

*Patsch and before the Kopf* also of me the congratulations on the 2C. Perhaps it folds. As a wise man says: Attempt makes kluch!

Thanks for the congratulations

Perhaps a Admin gives me the transmission to the birthday

Me it depends however mainly on the authentic appearance here in the forum. And so 2,000 Postings are fixed reached

Hello Daniel,

also of me fast still another cordial welcome in the forum and congratulations on two-thousandth post office!

Tja, such a thing does not bring everyone

Thanks you, Bibie

@Daniel Lcking: But whether one recognizes you in such a way? DanMac stood for Daniel Lcking for certain information and specialized knowledge however?

I will not give Gismotro up. Because I would not like not to abandon material name separate around me to protect. I think you it will fast repent with your material name to work.

@DanMac: Congratulations on your 2000sten Poste also of me!

@Gismotro

I think, the signature facilitate recognizing - I take everything else on me.

& thanks for the congratulations on 2,000 Posting.

Normally there is a whole set of name cousins also to a material name in Germany, so that even the use of the material name for most humans does not represent a problem. It, if still the place becomes closer stood and one can investigate in such a way by Goggle search briefly times all possible details to a person. Then the conclusion on the genuine Wohnadressse and a lot of further, personal history is no more large feat.

Why is however potentially risky? Here only a few examples:

There were cases, in which burglars evaluated aimed profiles of persons, in order to identify holiday-makers and to out-rob then dwellings/houses. Here something to this topic.

An employer can determine by time data on Postings whether this happened in the work time, and if, with the time accountings of the respective person compared this. At least embarrassingly, if one exercised significant private activities in the work time.

As long as one remains in Postings material and clean, that is not all a problem. One can perpetuate oneself in mailing lists and forums and Blogs with competent comments. Google and other search machines also still find it after years. It becomes embarrassing only if one in the juvenile (or in any way caused) carelessness or over courage strikes, to-ton-triumphs compromising pictures over the strands - Postings, doubtful opinions,… that can drop back later to one, without one has really the option to still correct after years.

If one somewhere still its date of birth brings in the play, then it should be clear one that at many Shops and organizations name, address and date of birth for an identification to be sufficient. Thus abuse can be committed. If one buys then some more from this person for a few euro, one has also a bank account and perhaps even a telephone number, if one could check this not already on-line with the address and the name. Interesting data records over persons can so fast be arranged.

One should be very careful thus with, which really over the own person “world-wide public” one would like to make, because one determines the extensive consequences often only very many later. In the same way I became before all too open use of Social network, like Xing, left DIN, Plaxo, Spoke and/or. FaceBook, MySpace and like it all hot, warn.

That means not that I guess/advise generally only to anonymizating networks and wild aliases. I would like to see only a healthy caution in handling personal data. How looks for each particular, everyone must decide for itself…

--gandalf.

I see that just as decided, as Gandalf.

The quantity of price given data makes it for out at the latest if one homepage or it operates a Blog arrived as much in the net that effects have it can .

If it should come really once to abuse of the data, would have however already:

- Identity card number
- Bank account (no feat)
- and also the own email account chopped its, so that a salesman could make also really requirements personally valid against me.

Unauthorisierte deductions of the account can be booked (at any time) back.

In addition, as more normally “letter post receivers” a certain risk exists - nevertheless we indicate addresses and many other data.

Momentarily the indication of my Realnames shortens only the procedure of the data larceny - and that is insignificant, if it should foreseeing as someone in such a way on me.

At the latest, since a forum contribution from the 90ern to the topic Expo2000 in the local restaurant press with my used material name at that time was quoted and I there besides as Internetfreak was designated, I work exclusive with Nicknames. Since I use usually the same (rollo actually only here), am also certain recognizing value available.

jo

If one liked to have the postal address of Daniel, then is here by this example within 1.5 minutes made (material time!!)

There one gets then the info.: Complete address, Provider, telephone number, if necessary. Name of the partner. From this already again many other acts can be knitted. Reliably one is not any more, as soon as one indicates its name, or a Domain operates. If is registered, with a nameful Provider, then one is all right discoverable.

In order to get a bank account together with names, one goes simply into a bank and dumps the garbage pail beside the statement printer. Nothing lighters than that.

It remains each nothing else to be as watchful and account statements to judge and/or its post office critically.

I already got a letter of eBay, in which it was communicated to me that I was to enter the provided code for the verification of my account.
Problem: not my Mailadresse and I do not have tried, there an account to open. Many people fall possibly on such meshes in here.

Only become ******** also better and better. (I mean humans, those bad want!)

@rollo

Such a thing becomes then for example also completely fast times topic in my Blog

I harvested even in the context of the study sign politician campaign a “Bloggerkommentar”, I am naively to be believed that the politicians would also really use the profiles used with study.

Badly there against only the Blogger had investigated - it escaped him that I had gepostet this question into several politician guest books and simply on the reactions strained was. By comment in its Blog I related however again.

I think however, so long nobody “virtually the trousers down leave” remain a single opinion and without extensive consequences.

“I would by the way have taken Internet Freak” to the cause to make an announcement. “Freak” is a rating statement and obviously to the Diffarmierung had been used, because an expressed opinion was not popular.

In addition there is however - sometime - in my Blog also a chapter to the topic “also Internet identities has rights!” or “injury of the personality rights in the Internet”.

I think there a little differently:
I do not need Internet Reputation, therefore I give in the Internet as few ones as possible to price.
In different forums I arise with other Nicknames, the user pictures am naturally just as different. … Two people know in in individual forums mean genuine names, are however nevertheless not in the situation to close assistance of these data on my activities in other forums. Like that it is also with possible data leakages which lie outside of my area of responsibility ensured that I can move halfway unimpaired in the net. That does not prevent me however to hold back me in such a way everywhere that I can remain without bad conscience also for a long time there. Stop so, as if I would be there as a material person. In the true life I behave also (the circumstances) as appropriately and politely as possible.
Which Datenkraken still manage in such a way like google and CO, I cannot naturally say.

Nevertheless, Daniel: Respect for your decision and congratulations on the 2000er.

@ Zwerch

With the account statements you address a very sensitive range. One can meet that only by own considered behavior.

@Novize

Thanks for the congratulations!

Concerning Datenkraken & data leakages - there the enterprises, as also our government are demanded to transact in my eyes, investments, which secure exactly against it.

******** Takes data larceny eien is a business and the preventive measures partly becomes from comfort - partly from lack of interest in sufficient measure did not seize.

Here can you reread, which can become also completely involuntary one the data thief.

The simple question about the birth name of the nut/mother or the favourite domestic animal would have already been sufficient in this case, in order to make entrance data the available made 2/3 useless.

Quotation:

Quotation of gandalf94305

If one somewhere still its date of birth brings in the play, then it should be clear one that at many Shops and organizations name, address and date of birth for an identification to be sufficient.

Not only for it. See:
http://conspiracy-theory.org/index.p...57.html#msg257

But who point in the described connection that there is the possibility, information over the own person by the inhabitant reporting offices to forbid - to keyword information barrier?

All the same with which inquiry one (if one requested it) receives information, for which and the information goes can if necessary. also forbid.

In all other respects it might not be made so easily possible to request condition documents on-line - if nevertheless is there urgent action need!

Hello Daniel,

if it is your own desire, and in such a way it looks, your data admits here to admit, then it is your thing.
Which can result to “dangers” from it, should you with three times seven Lebensjahren consciously admits to be.

To discuss one does not need actually. Who actually its own side in the net has publishes a part of its data inevitably.

Which I however not completely to divide, is the statement of you can: “Beyond that I think that an expression of opinion has value even if the person stands behind it.”
Whether that now anonymous or with names appears changes for me as a reader only once nothing.
Otherwise 70% of the reports would be in newspapers nothing value, because also no names are specified in the plain language here.

Greeting franc

Rear franc,

the topic expression of opinion addresses itself also only to the group the alias user, which criticize neither constructionally, still halfway label knows and/or. use.

Novize did not already implement that there is also reliable pseudo user, through flaming the etc. are noticeable.

To me personally went some the unqualified overall attacks of the last weeks clearly too far and I hope that the restraining threshold rises little, if a recognizably material person arises.

Thus some seems to come with opinions of others as well as opposite opinions only with difficulty rightfully.

I would not like to step anybody too close, but:
Whether in a Thread now a “material” person emerges or not, which will not bring some user to change or on any rules respect their behavior.
It tariffs not even the Admins respect (to see like already several times here in the forum was). There it will bring nothing. But Daniel decided for a way, by which he would like to affirm the seriousness of its commitment. But respect.

So - the first attendance in other profiles are to register - therefore it a small request:

It would be nice, if you a short message leave, so that I can reconstruct, how much interest of these Thread generates here.

I habs registers

@Feuer-Fritz: What? the change of name? Better late than never ........

Quotation:

It would be nice, if you a short message leave, so that I can reconstruct, how much interest of these Thread generates here.

@Daniel Lcking: What exactly do you want to hear?

That you heard it, Kleinwchsiger

[OT] I am not small

, nevertheless specially large feet gotten thereby the dirt has faster to after-slip can…. [/OT]

OT: ON no jokes over unabnderbare body characteristics - the poor Gis

! OT: OFF

I observe only my on-line profiles regularly and hook in particular with name searches after, in which connection was looked for for me. Short “hello” is enough to me, then I know that that is to be led access to my activity here back

Edit: 02.03.2010

Today the offer came to merge both accounts on the part of the Mods.

According to the principle: Completely or not at all! took place now the connection!

Thank you for the support!

Yawn, that is times correctly consistent

Welcomely as an unknown quantity also over 2000 Posts!

Hey Daniel, congratulations!

Thanks

Should go now however somewhat inclined, I must there through

And which has it now really brought?
From where I know now whether Daniel Lcking no fantasy name is?

Well, apparently at least each quantity of attention.

Guude,

and congratulation to the further-left more postcounter….

well siehste… the Admins can nevertheless, if they want…

warming up HP:. .bin strained, when they adapt the VIP status >of the 5k user…

*scnr*

Super that went.

In the place cordial thanks to the forum guidance.

Quotation:

Quotation of gismotro

And which has it now really brought?

An in any case good discussion about “occurrence in the Internet - pro and cons OF (pseudo) Identities”.

With question “2” you will be able to cause clarifying, or?

Did you already change your telephone number?

In the directory I was located already before

Quotation:

Quotation of Daniel Lcking

An in any case good discussion about “occurrence in the Internet - pro and cons OF (pseudo) Identities”.

I cannot reconstruct with the change of name.
What was a pseudo identity at DanMac?
Haste in your signature nevertheless always the reference to your material names had, of therefore probably rather a pointed name.

Which me is however not completely clear, it is that you may sell into your victory your study and from the board team not when advertisement and offence against the forum rules are rated.

There it does not seem to really give a uniform proceeding for all user. Would be however beautiful to experience times which sales stands in agreement with the forum rules.

Hello Steffen,

I think that it acts with the study not around a commodity, but around a own contribution, which by the “selling price” is protected, in order to increase the abuse threshold. In all other respects knowledge has still another value, than the secondary offer of commodity, which one can refer also in other places.

One can stop such work nigends, without running the risk that abuse thereby is committed. Nevertheless I would like that the PAPER is accessible, since I do not want to work for the drawer.

To date I was addressed by no Mod on it and the left am for well three months in my signature.

To the other notes, see post office #1 and the following.

Post under material name is at least in the Usenet for a long time usual. One however never knows also there whether someone does not invent a “beautifully sounding” material name.

Anonymity is at the latest pure theory if one wants to publish in the net. At the latest if one switches own homepage for this purpose or also only purely to the Mailen a Domain gets themselves, everyone knows the complete postal address, since the WHOIS information for everyone is accessible… In my opinion an enormous data security gap. At least for private Domains a blockage of the data should be possible.

I think also that the discussion is kept artificial over the “dangers in the net” on very high Nieveau.

Who acts in the net, can make only in very limited measure purely the leisure pleasure “times even” - technical, like also organizational preventive measures must be simple.

Nobody comes on the idea the fact that one may use simply such a car - but one makes a driving licence and remains the danger nevertheless in the Starssenverkehr to exist.
However we accept these daily.

Like that it is evenly also in the net - one must be conscious the dangers, where possible also preventive measures meet and letzenendes can do nevertheless still something passiern.
In addition, that is not a reason here not to be in the net on the way.

Or leave you your dwelling only for the purchase and the work?

In principle I agree you to remain but over with the autocomparison: One must possess a driving licence, but one drives around in the long run only with aliases a characteristic. None hangs its driving licence to the windshield and gives so the complete address price. The problem with the WHOIS remains thus. I remain with the fact that for private people a blockage of the WHOIS data should be possible.

Quotation:

Quotation of Daniel Lcking

In all other respects it might not be made so easily possible to request condition documents on-line - if nevertheless is there urgent action need!

Negatively: http://www.spiegel.de/politik/auslan...679223,00.html

@sven

Exactly the article is appropriate for the comment to reason. Directory, WHOIS and a carelessness in Social network put the basis - and a badly secured process of the administration does its remaining in addition.

@ MReimer

I see the right to informational self-determination likewise reduced in this case.

But which brings it, if I arise only in few places in the net publicly?
Thus I actually increase the value of the stolen personal data.
An abuse is not noticeable then quasi.

“Consider Lies Mueller”, which lost its account statement and their telephone number in the directory registered, I clearly more susceptible/endangered pro supplier from Fake identities to to become.

If I with the farmer in the village admits am, it is insignificant whether an order of 50 hundredweights potatoes on my name entering it will be noticeable to it and will become also different one me to it to refer.