Anonymization of network accesses - VoIP General, VoIP News, VoIP Providers, VoIP hardware, VoIP software, VoIP Technology

GATE concerned

[This Thread separated from here]

@norati, i.f, R.S and as you also otherwise you to still register likes:

GATE is surely suitable in some countries an interesting project and to go around certain control devices furnished by governments and/or. usually awarded human rights such as Pressefreiheit and the right to free expression of opinion to exercise.

I find it however most doubtful, if behind an actually positive project also SPAMmer hide themselves, which use this infrastructure actively. I find it just as doubtful, if cowards hide themselves behind GATE, in order to accomplish verbal attacks against other participants of the forum under the Deckmntelchen of anonymity. By the BSI one recommends?

In the interest of the forum we will close therefore in the future registrations from users from addresses, which are noticeable by increased Spam activities, consistently.

Since GATE is another topic than the topic of this Threads, I shifted the contributions accordingly.

--gandalf.

@norati: There you have probably very much in-interpreted in Wichards contribution. In addition, I generally do not see (off) a valuation of anonymizating announcing servers. Who however in this forum and in this somewhat explosive Thread a comment delivers very concretely should this not still additionally anonymizating by an identical announcing practice do. It arouses - whether rightfully or to wrong the appearance, as if it does not want to remain itself not discoverable with its own words identified or from other reasons. Nobody in this forum has probably in principle something against new user and just as in principle also nothing against a registration under use of Anonymisierungstools, although there is not the smallest reason for the latter from my view straight in such a forum. It appears stop under summary of many circumstances sometimes somewhat suspect, which it is under other circumstances perhaps not.

Quotation:

Quotation of norati

From where does yielding pool of broadcasting corporations know, when I used GATE?

AMONG OTHER THINGS the name “gate-exit-rout. ---------. --” this assumption suggests.

Quotation:

Quotation of norati

How added gandalf, me is other Nicks anzudichten?

Mentioned above the interesting correlation between “new” users of the board, the substantial communication need, by me, too skyteddy and the use of GATE or other Anonymisierern. Of gandalf Nicks mentioned, you still another few further show quite remarkable agreements in these points.

Quotation:

Quotation of norati

you expressed yourself down devaluing over GATE. Thus I understood it at least.

The regular repetition does not make it more correct.

Greeting,
Yielding pool of broadcasting corporations

Rear one,

Which (surely not only) amusing I find:
Since there is the Fred with the Petition, announce themselves (a user under constantly new Nicks or nevertheless several) new user; amusing way everything over Anonymisierer; and try in this Fred too stnkern (sorry, but differently I can not interpret such a behavior).

Thus I in place of the “bosses” would think exactly the same and an acting here.

And even if it does not fit/the user (n) absolutely, which happens here.
The Mods and the forum boss have a house right!!!!
Who cannot live with the way of the practice of this right or wants and walk therefore equal “censorship”, which may remain far please for this forum and produce itself where differently or adapt to the here dominant customs. And in addition a “clean” registration belongs for me (with all respect for the Privatsphre).

Just my 2 cents.

Greetings
Snyder

I have no problem with anonymizations… finally I also use a set of it. One does not have always with its full sentence at personal data inclusive. Tax number in the Internet on the way its. We require here also no PostIdent for the forum registration.

It must be however clear that if it concerns to repair this forum peace - if need be by exclusion of individual evil toners - offenses, Herumtrollen, unobjective expressions and personal attacks on other forum participants, who disturb altogether the forum peace it to measures here will give. Thus the reference took place to remain material and return to the topic in different places - without substantial effect - in the conscious Thread (and I had that already correctly referenziert). The appeal helps to the healthy human understanding not and states one on the contrary that itself some cowards (if necessary. also only singular) suddenly behind anonymization networks hide, and lively in the same form far hereditary lab Berne, then also the measures change. That is Spam and likewise is then punished. In addition that is an abuse of GATE, which brings with it also the gate project and its achievements in disrepute.

Material criticism at whatever can here in the forum are attached… unfltiges behaviour one does not wait. Actually as in the correct life, or?

That had to be said times so much clearly.

--gandalf.

Quotation:

Quotation of gandalf94305

In addition that is an abuse of GATE, which brings with it also the gate project and its achievements in disrepute.

That is correct, gate is for closed Iranians and Chinese etc. there and not for German “end of workday Funanarchisten”.

Not to confound with freenet.org (' s gives still?).

Due to the Threadvandalismus through norati I close here. A meaningful discussion is unnecessary thereby.