Net neutrality: Telefnica asks Google & cost. to the cash

Nextiva is a cloud based VoIP phone system, hosting lots of small and medium sized businesses nationwide. the provides UNLIMITED business calling for only $19.95 a month!! Click here for the detail about this promotion!!

heise on-line Quotation:

The Spanish telecommunications giant Telefnica search machine operator for the use of the nets wants to ask to the cash. “The search machines use our net, without they pay, said something for it” Telefnica president Csar Alierta according to Spanish Press reports of Monday. “That is beautifully bad for it, but for us. But it is also evident that this cannot continue in such a way. “

Source and further here...

---

Also not badly, then one can make also cash and equivalent twice…

---

Then Google will not no more serve evenly times of user from these nets…
What probably believes your who the economic war wins?
Since that in business not is interspersable might it a political raid against the net neutrality of certain TK-companies than lobbyists at the European Union concern.

---

Interesting beginning.

Forgets the Internetprovider evenly only that they make only then business, if the paying Internet customers have on contents, on which her access can. There are not those, then would be also the customers away.

---

more @KD-Nutzer, nee, of the incomes from advertising, which have the search machines, one wants IMHO which to measure. Saved then the own advertisement and is many more efficient.

---

That is nevertheless an illusory argument. Finally that is Internet a loose heap of networks, which are somehow connected with one another. Provider must make a regulation concerning costs for the Interconnection of their autonomous systems with their partners, i.e. blicherweise werden Provider fr Uplinks nher zum Core der Landes-Internet-Backbones entsprechende Kosten berechnet. The Interconnects in the core charges among themselves costs and continues to load these indirectly again their partners/customers. The Provider computes the costs of customers on basis of their own costs and possible tariffs.

If a Provider has thus a cost problem, he can do only one of three things:
- the Interconnect costs by choice of new partners/contracts lower
- the costs of the customers increase
- own overhead costs by higher efficiency, e.g. Automation, lower

If Google has own Crawler in the network of Telefonic, then Telefonic would know the Traffickosten etc. for this kind of own special customers (e.g. also probably Akamai) increase. That is legitimate.

Google does not have own systems in the network of Telefonic, i.e. if no direct customer is, then few possibilities exist, as long as the use happens in the context of normal contingents with the Interconnect partners of Telefonic.

Now Telefonic with “fair Use” could argue and say that Google etc. a superproportional portion (e.g. 10%) of the Traffics cause, i.e. Range other customers take away and for bottlenecks provide in such a way. To this case Telefonic should introduce a restriction of range for goal nets, so that Google and others are down-regulated on a smaller portion. There are these technical possibilities today easily.

Telefonic has however with the ranges apparent no problem, but would like only simply times a large user, who is at the same time probably Nichtkunde (or customer to only small extent), to the cash to ask. That is IMHO nevertheless quite absurdly. Then one would know also the Provider of large customer nets (AOL, A&T, Comcast,…) to the cash ask, because their user have collectively also a large portion.

--gandalf.