Web.de users call without own account with those? - VoIP General, VoIP News, VoIP Providers, VoIP hardware, VoIP software, VoIP Technology

I have a Asterisk and wants also web.de users to call to be able. Unfortunately it folds @web.de with (number) and/or. (Number) @sip.web.de not. Me can one tell as I a user to call there can? Or do web.de unauthorized callers block? With sipgate.de goes to ' s….
My error message with the Asterisk (numbers and IP made unrecognizable):
Executing dial (“SIP/12345-b11f”, “”) in new stack
-- parse_srv: SRV mapped ton host sip ha.web.de, haven 5060
-- Called [[XXXXXXX@sip.web.de]]
January 17 20:31: 58 NOTICE [1580]: chan_sip.c: 6859 handle_response: Failed ton authenticate on INVITE ton 'of “my mine” <sip: 12345@ 12.34.56.78>; tag=as37eeb410'

So far I white does not go it with web.de.

If to me someone a web.de number by pn sends try out I it gladly again with different Clients.

jo

perhaps that helps:

What means it to be by telephone attainable under my FreeMail address?
Into the FreePhone attitudes specify you whether you would like to be by telephone attainable also under its FreeMail address (nutzername@web.de). If you activated this function, you are - z. B. by input of its FreeMail address into the FreePhone telephone software - apart from your personal FreePhone call number also under your FreeMail address by telephone attainable; a practical function, if your friends and acquaintance do not have its call number handy straight, however its FreeMail address remembered.

@rollo: TC, beautiful muck. ENUM of entries does not give ' s for the Web.de to numbers also. Whether with Asterisk “insecure=very” in sip.conf helps there?

@voodoobaby: I do not think that with it a “external” accessibility am meant. The email address is then also only an alias on the number.

I ask yourself only as one otherwise to now solve can. I could get myself an account with web.de, only then telephone all users (for it to finally be was) over to mine account to Web.de users. Thus no solution…

Thus, it should completely simply also USERNAME@sip.web.de function.
The call number of Web.de do not use, but only the user name.

Quotation:

Quotation of kossy Thus, it should completely simply also USERNAME@sip.web.de function.
The call number of Web.de do not use, but only the user name.

Thanks for the reference. I must be able to select however by number, because I cannot register each Web.de which can be called user with me. On my Asterisk it gives some user already in such a way, and who wants to call white whom all this with web.de.

I have to call it with X-Lite tried with speedy1980 and get 407 “Authentication a Required” in such a way remembered I also.

To someone the opposite proves remains web.de on the negative list.

Greeting,

jo

Quotation:

Quotation of speedy1980 I have a Asterisk and wants also web.de users to call to be able. Unfortunately it folds @web.de with (number) and/or. (Number) @sip.web.de not. Me can one tell as I a user to call there can? Or do web.de unauthorized callers block? With sipgate.de goes to ' s….

You can select nevertheless <simply> webde telephone number @sipgate.de, sipgate and web.de are hooked up and the call cost nix.

Greeting,
Robert/WrMulf

It concerns whether web.de users without registration can be achieved with any Provider, how is usual with “normal” VoIP the Provider.

jo

Quotation:

Quotation of WrMulf You can select nevertheless <simply> webde telephone number @sipgate.de, sipgate and web.de are hooked up and the call cost nix.

Greeting,
Robert/WrMulf

Test I times out. Would at least be a temporary solution.

Quotation:

Quotation of rollo It concerns whether web.de users without registration can be achieved with any Provider, how is usual with “normal” VoIP the Provider.

Then the Thread title is however not clear.

As I do not see am some offerers “normally”, e.g. also not nikotel. But by the increasing net unions and (prop. guessing acres or also genuine) the ENUM Lookup of the Provider it plays nevertheless soon no more role whether I reach offerers by means of its direct SIP-URI. And with any Provider most users are evenly nevertheless registered.

Just my 5 pence.

Greeting,
Robert/WrMulf

Quotation:

Quotation of WrMulf Quotation:

Quotation of rollo It concerns whether web.de users without registration can be achieved with any Provider, how is usual with “normal” VoIP the Provider.

Then the Thread title is however not clear.

It concerns with Internettelefonie nevertheless that one is attainable from the entire Internet. What uses it me, if I could with a web.de account and me only user of web.de or sipgate.de call now? What would be with foreign friends with another Provider are? Net interconnections are beautiful and good, solve however not. All Provider would have to set ENUM of entries and configure accordingly their servers, so that the users can be called from everywhere. One cannot switch eternally nets together that must more global are solved.

Quotation:

Quotation of WrMulf As I do not see am some offerers “normally”, e.g. also not nikotel.

Exactly I wanted to express that thereby.

Quotation:

Quotation of WrMulf But by the increasing net unions and (prop. guessing acres or also genuine) the ENUM Lookup of the Provider it plays nevertheless soon no more role whether I reach offerers by means of its direct SIP-URI. And with any Provider most users are evenly nevertheless registered.

Just my 5 pence.

Greeting,
Robert/WrMulf

The net interconnection is nevertheless only a Workaround and can as Marktinggag hold beautiful. It would be simpler, if all Provider ENUM supported and permitted a choice over SIP URIs.

jo

Quotation:

Quotation of rollo
The net interconnection is nevertheless only a Workaround and can as Marktinggag hold beautiful. It would be simpler, if all Provider ENUM supported and permitted a choice over SIP URIs.

jo

Evenly. Then no Provider needs to shear itself around the other one. And everyone can recruit with the fact that one is attainable from everywhere. And not only of certain Providern.
ENUM is actually so simple. One needs only one entry in the DNS for a number block, then all numbers of the block are attainable. And there ENUM still in the test operation in Germany is, does not cost so a Domain not times which.

Quotation:

Quotation of WrMulf
You can select nevertheless <simply> webde telephone number @sipgate.de, sipgate and web.de are hooked up and the call cost nix.

Greeting,
Robert/WrMulf

I a test now made. On the sipgate.de web page stands, one is to select the complete number. One calls a Web.de number over sipgate.de, thus [[01212311XXXXXXX@sipgate.de]], then comes “500 - servers internal failure”. That made me stutzig, I thus means sipgate.de account taken and it with it tried. Number selected, but same error. I test that tomorrow once again. There recruit largely with net interconnection and then goes that not yet times if one an account with those has.

I once again, today again tested. With a Sipgate.de account one can telephone to failures” not to web.de account, “500 - servers internal. As yesterday even, see to previous post office.
If one telephones however with web.de account to sipgate.de number, then that functions. Web.de has thus apparent problems with IP telephone calls of not web.de accounts, and even the net interconnections go being supposed not as her. Whether one times a Mail sends there (only where then)? This mad service number call I anyhow not on, which could have at least one disturbance place over IP-Telefonie free of charge attainable.

Quotation:

Quotation of speedy1980 ... those could have at least one disturbance place over IP-Telefonie free of charge attainable.

That would only unfortunately bring you in case of a disturbance nothing.

Either you reach the number - then there is no disturbance - or you do not reach her, because disturbance…

Greeting,
Robert/WrMulf

My support inquiry of Sipgate.de was answered. It means that only the 01212 preselections of web.de would at present not be attainable. Starting from next week is to again go it. We will see

)

thus at least I must say, fold of 1&1 and GMX from the selection my WEBde number via 02222948xxxxxx@sipgate.de
Otherwise however a tragedy

thus one can click there greatly in the WEBde menu of because of attainable to be over Username@web.de and then the whole quark folds only internally

then nevertheless better so a muck do not offer

Thus apart from the Sipgate technology (and of that we hope first times that them do not cost anything) it does not go to ' s otherwise with WEBde, neither username nor call number @web.de, or @sip.web.de is usable

As far as I know after freenet and Nikotel makes for same rubbish. One is arriving over mustermann@freenet.de and/or. mustermann@calamar0.nikotel.com outside of these nets not attainable. I believe it with Dusnet am exactly the same.

Apparent one cannot do for some time also more [[XXXXXX@sipgate.de]] call, “Failed tons authenticate on INVITE ton…”. Does someone have a solution? I have a Asterisk with many users drauf to let there was it bld to get itself sipgate.de account and then everything run over it.

Did you try it times with 1und1.de, schlund.de, sip.1und1.de or sip-gmx.net instead of sipgate.de? Quotation:

Our Peeringabkommen makes beyond that free discussions to and from the VoIP for nets possible of 1&1, GMX, Schlund&Partner, freenet, Nikotel and Sipgate.

Here in addition a list is:
http://www.ip-phone-forum.de/forum/v...ic.php?t=21168

Again--
ENUM solves the problem.

with portunity.net a ENUM Domain request and everything else on it reroute, makes sure completely!

Greetings
Gnter

do you say to me finely like you yours sipeintrag set with Portunity?

On those
Emailadresse@web.de
or 02222XXX@web.de
or 0222xxx@sip.web.de

or do you have evtl 01212 a number??

I did not create that also ever

Quotation:

Quotation of loost74 Here in addition a list is:
http://www.ip-phone-forum.de/forum/v...ic.php?t=21168

Cool one, thanks, the Thread knew I not yet. Are momentarily also rather little actively here…

Quotation:

Quotation of ploieel Again--
ENUM solves the problem.

Evenly straight this problem does not solve ENUM. If the Provider everything would participate in the regular ENUM, then we would have not to discuss here. As already says merlion: You need the SIP-URI for a ENUM entry. And it applies exactly straight rauszufinden.

why gentleman-out-find. I think we already know it.

Thus I assume that the calls to be simply blocked.

Or there gives did it still another completely secret SIP URL meinste is then also publicly attainable? I do not believe…

But I can be ploieelberzeugen gladly of

Send me nevertheless simply times please by pn your ENUM. Those would query gladly times and times nen test would make.

Greeting

merlion

Here there is a Thread “ENUM explanation need”, there is screenshots, how the bypasses are to be adjusted with portunity. I registered one my MSN with GMX as fixed net number and with portunity in addition a ENUM Domain procured. When I had then, I had made as into screenshots shown the bypass on sipgate.

Similarly should go nevertheless also with a WebDe number…

Or you ask Opilein, it seem times here the expert in things ENUM to be.

You the Opilein is a good acquaintance of me.

Actually we solve all our problems together however it are straight times in the vacation and that are gegnnt it.

But we have that unfortunately also never production therefore were also the question whether we times your screens of Portunity get could.

On GMX has I mean Enum put also.
There that folds also perfectly.

ENUM is genuinly ne mad thing however unfortunately not the solution for everything…

Sometimes IMHO is also simple the configuration of the SIP server debt.

But actually those should change also times. Nevertheless you do not belong to company to the UI (United Domains) and with the VoIP service of GMX and 1&1 also such a kindergarten mirror-image moose are operated.

Have been could which you a VIP SIP Uri of Web.de have

Moment, the Web.de portal as well as the Internet advertising company of that were assimilated by UI. Web.de Freephone and the other communication services so far I does not know.

…. the sales of the successful portal Web.de at the Internetdienstleister United Internet (GMX, 1&1) in Montabaur, expensive over 330 million euro, already approves. After conclusion of the business the Web.de AG in Combots is to be renamed AG. The name Web.de remains however for the sold portal….

..... It expressed some over 200 present shareholders the concern that the successful portal becomes properly “silvered”, which could give angepriesene alternative of an Internet telecommunications from the executive committee however losses.

Many more optimistically the Web.de executive committee pointed itself the day before with the presentation of the new plans to things Internet telecommunications. Afterwards the enterprise listed in the Tec DAX aims at started, involving heavy losses Internet communication platform Comwin with Combots, the successor product of the 2002, in some years the market leader shank. The new system is to make comfortable communication possible apart from an easier data exchange by means of telephone, mobile phone and computer. Under favorable conditions the executive committee did not want to exclude to be able to already reach 2007 with the new communication platform the break even point.

Quele of the news is heise

Thus I mean the Freemail now belonged to UI… However erring can do me

Do not nail down please

Quotation:

Have been could which you a VIP SIP Uri of Web.de have sign

No, I do not have unfortunately. But I have a Asterisk, and which can reach a Web.de number by means of sipgate and a Web.de participant can reach me by means of sipgate. It may be that this constellation is to be managed also without ENUM…

Greetings
Gnter

Tja that has however the reason that a Peering agreement exists here.

Overview SIPgate Peering

To telephone attempts nevertheless times from GMX on web.de. My judgement will not go…

But,… @sip-gmx.net, bad example goes to 01212.

See http://www.ippf.tk/forum/viewtopic.php?p=160709#160709, however none reacted drauf and I cannot it for lack of to web.de contacts test.

Addition:
New Peeringpartner - interfoni.de
http://www.ippf.tk/forum/viewtopic.php?p=161480#161480

but that is nevertheless genuinly WAD highly 79

In the price list of GMX Netphone is located no price for 01212 numbers, but I assume in your kind 01212@sip-gmx.net the call is led on the “fixed net” better Web.de local area network.

With GMX it means:

Discussions net-internally for 0 Ct. /Min.
(to GMX NetPhones and in the partner net
1&1 DSL PLUS)

It tried times, call also came off on 01212 of GMX… Price determines ne surprise. Or Peering is available however no information in the tariff list…

With Web it means:

from FreePhone to FreePhone as well as into the VoIP of nets of 1&1, GMX, Schlund&Partner, freenet, Nikotel and Sipgate

Here also simply the SIP Uri is used and it folds free of charge

With GMX does not stand “net-internal discussions of GMX NetPhone to GMX NetPhone and to 1&1 DSL plus participants are free and in this connecting minutes contained.”
“You telephone at present with GMX NetPhone exclusively from Internet connection to Internet connection.”
Therefore I already believe to the data with web.de.

what is correct already? The web.de to GMX to telephone can? That can be done also as I above already said…
But turned around the GMX to Web.de on a number one does not find a price to 01212.
To 02222 fixed net price to be either normal or the Peeringabkommen (if it gives) from GMX to Web.de was eigepflegt up to now not on the GMX pages.

I look into my EVN times after whether costs enstanden there am. That is however unfortunately not real time; - (

With web.de to 1&1, GMX, Schlund&Partner, freenet, Nikotel and Sipgate could be evtl even e164.info von Sipgate in the use. Can be??

Because Vorwahl+Nummer@sipgate.de is actually nevertheless not my Sipgate Uri? Or is that an alias sipgate does set on my shorter SIPgate address??

@merlion:
Quotation:

Quotation of 1und1 Net-internally with other 1&1 DSL users 0 ct

Quotation:

Quotation of GMX Net-internal discussions of GMX NetPhone to GMX NetPhone and to 1&1 DSL plus participants are free
EDIT:GMX DSL Telefonie: Telephone free of charge between GMX, 1&1 and WEB.de users, and/or. in the German fixed net for 1 Ct. /Min.

Quotation:

Quotation of Throat + partners For 0, - ct/Min. telephone over Internet, if your interlocutor likewise uses a telephonable DSL modem and a throat + partner DSL VoIP tariff. Otherwise you profit from our favorable minute tariffs in the fixed net.

Quotation:

Quotation of WEB.DE Our Peeringabkommen makes beyond that free discussions possible too and out the VoIP nets of 1&1, GMX, Schlund&Partner, freenet, Nikotel and Sipgate.

Me neither by 1und1, GMX still throat was computed + partner something for connections to WEB.DE (012123) (GMX may compute/can me also nothing), therefore the statement on the WEB.DE side is probably correct and the remainder of UI keeps the Peeringabkommen secret.

Quotation:

Quotation of merlion Or there gives did it still another completely secret SIP URL meinste is then also publicly attainable? I do not believe…

ask nevertheless times interfoni those have sipuri obviously rausgefunden one can according to message now hintelfonieren there!!!

So far I white can one of GMX (1&1, throat) to Web.de free of charge.
From Web.de to GMX (1&1, throat) and Sipgate, freenet, Nikotel.
Are from GMX Sipgate, Nioktel and freenet not to reach free of charge, if at all.

In all other respects one knows also a Sipgate telephone number under GMX active animals.
Then one is attainable under this number from both nets.

The large lot are however not, much too expensive the 01212-Nummern for callers from the fixed net.
The 0222 is not no more assigned, except one lives there.

Emfehlung: GMX email address with VoIP furnish or Sipgate use…